jose buenaventura flores : I am Attorney Jose B. Flores, the longest serving lawyer/legal researcher 2, I owe to three Chief Justices and one Senior Justice the distinction I now enjoy.Something which I doubt could be considered as the Highpoint in one's career as a magistrate of the HighCourt. I have been for about 14 years now, a Court Legal Researcher II, and for almost 9 years now a lawyer with a monthly take home pay of about 12 thousand pesos. I have been bypassed in promotional appointment in favor of an outsider, and even in the designation as an officer in charge in favor of one who has not passed any civil service examination and who was appointed at a time when the immidiete supervisor was a relative. Is this an indictment of the system?. One of the main characteristics of the civil service is career advancement based obviuosly on merit and fitness, determined principally through a system of rating performance , please observe that it is only in the judiciary , among the many offices of the government where a higher professional achievement like passing the Bar examinations does not deserve a merit, my guess is the "founding fathers"might have thought that it would be absurd to make the same explicit. The present rating system in reality subverts the Constitutional policy since a "satisfactory"rating disqualifies a next in rank , an outsider who could be somebody's protegee is better situated . A rating system which relies heavily on the subjectively determined behavioral dimension, bereft of specific acts, misdeeds, or quotas and employing no definite standard. A protest to the appointment of a court employee is ultimately decided by the Honorable Chairmen of the Divisions of the Supreme Court, for the period relevant to my case, I believe you were one of them.The Decision according to the Rules is final , but not one I supposed which is void and timely objected to .According to the Court Administrator, the Protest I filed was denied by the Court on November 9, 2006, under Board Resolution No. 33C-2006. It was denied for lack of merit on the following grounds; 1. I obtained "Unsatisfactory" performance rating, 2. more so, because the Court found Protestee to be more competent and qualified in terms of psycho-social attributes, personality traits, potentials supported by the favorable recommendations of the Acting Presiding Judge and the Executive Judge". The quoted part readily indicates that the "Decision"is beyond the category of denial or refusal of due course of a petition for review or a motion for reconsideration , but more in the league of full blown decisions. What jurisprudential value does it have, the sense which could be obtained from it and may justify a withdrawal of the signatures from a draft, and the witholding of a promulgation.Was the Supreme Court misled? What methodology the experts utilized to identify and evaluate the alleged psycho social attributes and personality traits and in making a comparative analysis of the data, or was the conclusion arrived at on the basis of the totality of the evidence presented? For want of the necessary antecedents, or the statement of the ultimate facts in the "Resolution/Decision" ,may the denial of the Protest for want of merit be passed off or sustained as a statement of the legal basis?The Court Administrator declared that it will no longer entertain any request from Atty. Flores in this regard ., has the sub judice rule become inapplicable. Your time as a Justice of the Supreme Court is over, you have cemented your place in its history , but my time as the longest serving lawyer/legal researcher 2 remains an operative fact , its sheer absurdity would as years go on becomes stronger, strong enough , to break open from within, someone's place in the history of the Supreme Court ,to expose those who were responsible for the anomalous situation, there is still time for us , not to patch the crack but to identify those who manipulated us,those who placed rubbish in the foundation of your monument. Respectfully.

About Me

Contact Info
Status
Married
Birthdate
Gender
Male
Law School
far eastern university
Hometown
pampanga
Current Location
navotas
Profession
Lawyer
Law Office
RTC BR 120 Kalookan City
Organization / Affiliation
Facebook, We Support Chief Justice Reynato Puno Movement

Friends

71 friends

jose buenaventura flores

I am Attorney Jose B. Flores, the longest serving lawyer/legal researcher 2, I owe to three Chief Justices and one Senior Justice the distinction I now enjoy.Something which I doubt could be considered as the Highpoint in one's career as a magistrate of the HighCourt. I have been for about 14 years now, a Court Legal Researcher II, and for almost 9 years now a lawyer with a monthly take home pay of about 12 thousand pesos. I have been bypassed in promotional appointment in favor of an outsider, and even in the designation as an officer in charge in favor of one who has not passed any civil service examination and who was appointed at a time when the immidiete supervisor was a relative. Is this an indictment of the system?. One of the main characteristics of the civil service is career advancement based obviuosly on merit and fitness, determined principally through a system of rating performance , please observe that it is only in the judiciary , among the many offices of the government where a higher professional achievement like passing the Bar examinations does not deserve a merit, my guess is the "founding fathers"might have thought that it would be absurd to make the same explicit. The present rating system in reality subverts the Constitutional policy since a "satisfactory"rating disqualifies a next in rank , an outsider who could be somebody's protegee is better situated . A rating system which relies heavily on the subjectively determined behavioral dimension, bereft of specific acts, misdeeds, or quotas and employing no definite standard. A protest to the appointment of a court employee is ultimately decided by the Honorable Chairmen of the Divisions of the Supreme Court, for the period relevant to my case, I believe you were one of them.The Decision according to the Rules is final , but not one I supposed which is void and timely objected to .According to the Court Administrator, the Protest I filed was denied by the Court on November 9, 2006, under Board Resolution No. 33C-2006. It was denied for lack of merit on the following grounds; 1. I obtained "Unsatisfactory" performance rating, 2. more so, because the Court found Protestee to be more competent and qualified in terms of psycho-social attributes, personality traits, potentials supported by the favorable recommendations of the Acting Presiding Judge and the Executive Judge". The quoted part readily indicates that the "Decision"is beyond the category of denial or refusal of due course of a petition for review or a motion for reconsideration , but more in the league of full blown decisions. What jurisprudential value does it have, the sense which could be obtained from it and may justify a withdrawal of the signatures from a draft, and the witholding of a promulgation.Was the Supreme Court misled? What methodology the experts utilized to identify and evaluate the alleged psycho social attributes and personality traits and in making a comparative analysis of the data, or was the conclusion arrived at on the basis of the totality of the evidence presented? For want of the necessary antecedents, or the statement of the ultimate facts in the "Resolution/Decision" ,may the denial of the Protest for want of merit be passed off or sustained as a statement of the legal basis?The Court Administrator declared that it will no longer entertain any request from Atty. Flores in this regard ., has the sub judice rule become inapplicable. Your time as a Justice of the Supreme Court is over, you have cemented your place in its history , but my time as the longest serving lawyer/legal researcher 2 remains an operative fact , its sheer absurdity would as years go on becomes stronger, strong enough , to break open from within, someone's place in the history of the Supreme Court ,to expose those who were responsible for the anomalous situation, there is still time for us , not to patch the crack but to identify those who manipulated us,those who placed rubbish in the foundation of your monument. Respectfully.

Karma
Member since
Monday, 29 June 2009 11:43
Last online
1 hours 27 minutes ago
Profile views
394 views

jose buenaventura flores & friends jose buenaventura flores

Today

jose buenaventura flores and rulietha delacruz are now friends

11:02 PM

3 days ago

jose buenaventura flores and Johanna Kristine Hebrona are now friends

06:39 PM

1 week ago

jose buenaventura flores and Hennie Rosilla are now friends

Mar 04

jose buenaventura flores and Rowena Mayangat are now friends

Mar 01

Partner Ads

2009 Bar Countdown

The 2010 Bar Exam will start in

Goodluck to all Bar Examinees!

Message Board

Please Visit Our Forum!

drizter : meron po b d2ng ali vs castro case??
drizter : meron po b d2ng ali vs castro case??
abby : hi kindly help me i need commercial law latest reviewers
qwnxy : magkano nrolment arellano law review nila....thanx
qwnxy : magkano nrolment arellano law review nila....thanx
uztadz_24 : do you an idea when will be the release of 2009 bar?
wez : hello 2009 baristas. gudluck!
potchie :
potchie : hi can you give me an idea regarding legal research topics
potchie : hi can you give me an idea regarding legal research topics
nelaga :
redtagblogg : hi khim... welcome... obvious po na bago kayo, kasi nag-reply kayo sa isang post about land title na hindi naman related sa topic... hehe
khim : saan po pina process ang land title?
khim : hi.. bago po ako dito..
khim : hi.. bago po ako dito..
khim : hi.. bago po ako dito..
chrisgamuya : Atty. Flores, good evening! I replied to one of your mails. Hoping to talk to you soon
chrisgamuya : does anyone willing to talk about land registration law?
emanon_ph20 :
chuychay : atty.mhie can you give advice regarding oral defamation?
chuychay : seeks legal advice regarding oral defamation
escribiocet :
rjb :
emanon_ph20 : attorneys compensation depends on the services rendered if no contract was made pertaining thereto...
chrisgamuya : please connect with me via skype: chrisgamuyao
chrisgamuya : please connect with me via skype: chrisgamuyao
chrisgamuya : need advise obligation & contracts.
chrisgamuya : need advise obligation & contracts.
cathy_sulap : anyone from la salle university law school?
cathy_sulap : does anyone have case digest in credit transactions?paki-email lng po sa catherinesulapas@yahoo.com
frishbloom : can somebody help me kung ano ang magiging penalty if you were proven guilty for slight physical injury
frishbloom : can somebody help me kung ano ang magiging penalty if you were proven guilty for slight physical injury
Amani : I need some advise my relatives nasali sa carnapping, siya lang bibagsakan ng mga bike, ngaun hinahanap na siya nagtatago na siya ngaun, dapat ba na lumantad na siya.
Amani : I need some advise my relatives nasali sa carnapping, siya lang bibagsakan ng mga bike, ngaun hinahanap na siya nagtatago na siya ngaun, dapat ba na lumantad na siya.
black spide : anyone kindhearted fellow who can share the 2000 bar exams in ethics... pls upload to notesbank
marneltuble : Do you think Divorce will have a chance of becoming a law in the Philippines?

You have to login before you can shout!

Message:

Latest on Forum

Re:IN DIRE NEED OF LEGAL ADVICE
attyleolop 11.3.2010 22:11
Re:needed advice on civil matters
attyleolop 11.3.2010 21:39
Re:ofw on board w/ legal case
attyleolop 11.3.2010 9:06
Re:badly need some advice...
attyleolop 10.3.2010 20:19
Re:Costs of Studying Law
yham 10.3.2010 12:46
not a law student. . yet
yham 9.3.2010 20:52
aspiring law student
cs_nognog 9.3.2010 9:31
Re:how can I prepare for law?
uztadz_24 8.3.2010 9:53
Re:2010 Bar Exam Venue?
uztadz_24 6.3.2010 14:01
Re:TOPIC LEGRES
uztadz_24 5.3.2010 11:49

More...

Visits today:	378
Visits yesterday:	382
Visits month:	3766
Visits total:	163993
Max.daily visits:	3199
��occurred:	2008-3-29
Max.monthly visits:	12717
��occurred:	2009-4
Pages today:	4600
Pages yesterday:	4725
Pages this month:	44377
Pages total:	1797909
Bots today:	201
Data since:	2008-03-12

Online Community of Law Students and Lawyers in the Philippines!

Partner Ads

2009 Bar Countdown

Message Board

Latest on Forum

SC News

Bar News

Latest Uploads

Visitor Statistics