Online Community of Law Students and Lawyers in the Philippines!

0 user(s) online | Show All
 
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
  • default color
  • blue color
  • green color
About Me
Friends
71 friends
  • Johanna Kristine Hebrona
  • rosaire banday
  • MARITES SALVIEJO
  • RG Cantos
  • Hennie Rosilla
  • Janice Jeanne Balcita
  • Mimie V
  • Rowena Mayangat
  • Ma. Glaiza Lava
  • oliva ruth tampal
  • Hanna Schell Moreno
  • Lester Jay Alan II Flores
jose buenaventura flores
jose buenaventura flores
I am Attorney Jose B. Flores, the longest serving lawyer/legal researcher 2, I owe to three Chief Justices and one Senior Justice the distinction I now enjoy.Something which I doubt could be considered as the Highpoint in one's career as a magistrate of the HighCourt. I have been for about 14 years now, a Court Legal Researcher II, and for almost 9 years now a lawyer with a monthly take home pay of about 12 thousand pesos. I have been bypassed in promotional appointment in favor of an outsider, and even in the designation as an officer in charge in favor of one who has not passed any civil service examination and who was appointed at a time when the immidiete supervisor was a relative. Is this an indictment of the system?. One of the main characteristics of the civil service is career advancement based obviuosly on merit and fitness, determined principally through a system of rating performance , please observe that it is only in the judiciary , among the many offices of the government where a higher professional achievement like passing the Bar examinations does not deserve a merit, my guess is the "founding fathers"might have thought that it would be absurd to make the same explicit. The present rating system in reality subverts the Constitutional policy since a "satisfactory"rating disqualifies a next in rank , an outsider who could be somebody's protegee is better situated . A rating system which relies heavily on the subjectively determined behavioral dimension, bereft of specific acts, misdeeds, or quotas and employing no definite standard. A protest to the appointment of a court employee is ultimately decided by the Honorable Chairmen of the Divisions of the Supreme Court, for the period relevant to my case, I believe you were one of them.The Decision according to the Rules is final , but not one I supposed which is void and timely objected to .According to the Court Administrator, the Protest I filed was denied by the Court on November 9, 2006, under Board Resolution No. 33C-2006. It was denied for lack of merit on the following grounds; 1. I obtained "Unsatisfactory" performance rating, 2. more so, because the Court found Protestee to be more competent and qualified in terms of psycho-social attributes, personality traits, potentials supported by the favorable recommendations of the Acting Presiding Judge and the Executive Judge". The quoted part readily indicates that the "Decision"is beyond the category of denial or refusal of due course of a petition for review or a motion for reconsideration , but more in the league of full blown decisions. What jurisprudential value does it have, the sense which could be obtained from it and may justify a withdrawal of the signatures from a draft, and the witholding of a promulgation.Was the Supreme Court misled? What methodology the experts utilized to identify and evaluate the alleged psycho social attributes and personality traits and in making a comparative analysis of the data, or was the conclusion arrived at on the basis of the totality of the evidence presented? For want of the necessary antecedents, or the statement of the ultimate facts in the "Resolution/Decision" ,may the denial of the Protest for want of merit be passed off or sustained as a statement of the legal basis?The Court Administrator declared that it will no longer entertain any request from Atty. Flores in this regard ., has the sub judice rule become inapplicable. Your time as a Justice of the Supreme Court is over, you have cemented your place in its history , but my time as the longest serving lawyer/legal researcher 2 remains an operative fact , its sheer absurdity would as years go on becomes stronger, strong enough , to break open from within, someone's place in the history of the Supreme Court ,to expose those who were responsible for the anomalous situation, there is still time for us , not to patch the crack but to identify those who manipulated us,those who placed rubbish in the foundation of your monument. Respectfully.
  • Karma
  •  
  • Member since
  • Monday, 29 June 2009 11:43
  • Last online
  • 1 hours 27 minutes ago
  • Profile views
  • 394 views
 
 
Today
jose buenaventura flores and rulietha delacruz are now friends 11:02 PM
3 days ago
jose buenaventura flores and Johanna Kristine Hebrona are now friends 06:39 PM
1 week ago
jose buenaventura flores and Hennie Rosilla are now friends Mar 04
jose buenaventura flores and Rowena Mayangat are now friends Mar 01
 

Partner Ads

2009 Bar Countdown

The 2010 Bar Exam will start in
Goodluck to all Bar Examinees!

Message Board

Please Visit Our Forum!
  • drizter : meron po b d2ng ali vs castro case??
  • drizter : meron po b d2ng ali vs castro case??
  • abby : hi kindly help me i need commercial law latest reviewers
  • qwnxy : magkano nrolment arellano law review nila....thanx
  • qwnxy : magkano nrolment arellano law review nila....thanx
  • uztadz_24 : do you an idea when will be the release of 2009 bar?
  • wez : hello 2009 baristas. gudluck!
  • potchie : :)
  • potchie : hi can you give me an idea regarding legal research topics
  • potchie : hi can you give me an idea regarding legal research topics
  • nelaga : :D
  • redtagblogg : hi khim... welcome... obvious po na bago kayo, kasi nag-reply kayo sa isang post about land title na hindi naman related sa topic... hehe :P
  • khim : saan po pina process ang land title?
  • khim : :) hi.. bago po ako dito..
  • khim : :) hi.. bago po ako dito..
  • khim : :) hi.. bago po ako dito..
  • chrisgamuya : Atty. Flores, good evening! I replied to one of your mails. Hoping to talk to you soon
  • chrisgamuya : does anyone willing to talk about land registration law?
  • emanon_ph20 : :)
  • chuychay : atty.mhie can you give advice regarding oral defamation?
  • chuychay : seeks legal advice regarding oral defamation
  • escribiocet : :o
  • rjb : :)
  • emanon_ph20 : attorneys compensation depends on the services rendered if no contract was made pertaining thereto...
  • chrisgamuya : please connect with me via skype: chrisgamuyao
  • chrisgamuya : please connect with me via skype: chrisgamuyao
  • chrisgamuya : need advise obligation & contracts.
  • chrisgamuya : need advise obligation & contracts.
  • cathy_sulap : anyone from la salle university law school?
  • cathy_sulap : does anyone have case digest in credit transactions?paki-email lng po sa catherinesulapas@yahoo.com
  • frishbloom : can somebody help me kung ano ang magiging penalty if you were proven guilty for slight physical injury
  • frishbloom : can somebody help me kung ano ang magiging penalty if you were proven guilty for slight physical injury
  • Amani : I need some advise my relatives nasali sa carnapping, siya lang bibagsakan ng mga bike, ngaun hinahanap na siya nagtatago na siya ngaun, dapat ba na lumantad na siya.
  • Amani : I need some advise my relatives nasali sa carnapping, siya lang bibagsakan ng mga bike, ngaun hinahanap na siya nagtatago na siya ngaun, dapat ba na lumantad na siya.
  • black spide : anyone kindhearted fellow who can share the 2000 bar exams in ethics... pls upload to notesbank
  • marneltuble : Do you think Divorce will have a chance of becoming a law in the Philippines?

You have to login before you can shout!





Visitor Statistics

Visits today: 378
Visits yesterday: 382
Visits month: 3766
Visits total: 163993
Max.daily visits: 3199
��occurred: 2008-3-29
Max.monthly visits: 12717
��occurred: 2009-4
Pages today: 4600
Pages yesterday: 4725
Pages this month: 44377
Pages total: 1797909
Bots today: 201
Data since: 2008-03-12